|
|
Post by tanouryjr on Nov 5, 2009 22:08:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by tanouryjr on Nov 5, 2009 22:16:01 GMT -5
The District Attorney is investigating this now, so out of respect to his office, I want to limit what I say. I will simply say that we can't wait until the investigation is complete and reveals who was really behind these terrible lies and attempts to slander and ruin entire families. This is low.
Ralph, Corner, Clipper and everyone else, I thnk you with all my heart for all the kind words, support and confidene in me. We are VERY confident that we will win when the absentee ballots are counted next week. Even if we lose, I still consider us winners. I had the best supporters in the world. I believe in quality over quantity and I know my supporters voted for the right reasons, not because they were offered some booze or money for a hit. That's why I believe we will still win.
Bobbie, this is exactly why we have a District Attorney, to make sure that people can't run around breaking the law and ruining families. If this happened to your family, the DA would be there for you too. As for anything Civil, if it ever got to that point, I would have to pay for my own attorney to sue those responsible and anything won would be paid by them, not the taxpayers.
i disagreed with the lease too, but I would NEVER make an allegation public that I have absolutely no proof of. On top of that, it is none of my business and I certainly would never attack a man's family. I have differed with Fiorini on policy, but he is a decent man who has a great family. This has no place in politics.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbbiez on Nov 5, 2009 23:24:09 GMT -5
 Larry, "exactly" what is the DA's office investigating? I am totally confused on that.  Attempts to slander someone and trying to ruin their families has nothing to do with the DA's office. As I did state before that would be a Civil case and would be paid for by the individuals involved and not the taxpayer. I'm well aware of that and that's why I am confused on what exactly the DA is investigating. 
|
|
|
|
Post by tanouryjr on Nov 5, 2009 23:45:06 GMT -5
Read the article, Bobbie. It is illegal to write a letter that is known to be false and meant to harass and annoy someone. It's called aggravated harassment. Also, he made a claim that I blackmailed someone. That needs to be investigated so that I can clear my name. Trust me, there is A LOT to investigate here.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbbiez on Nov 6, 2009 11:39:54 GMT -5
Larry, I have been reading the articles. Other then the allegations mentioning you being involved in a blackmail scheme, (which would lead to a civil suit if you want to pursue charges against Hendricks for slander), I am confused on why all of a sudden the DA is investigating some thing that most of the legislators, including yourself, knew about before the election and didn't bring out or do anything about it. "In August, both Tanoury and Democratic Minority Leader Michael Hennessey, D-Sherill floated to reporters allegations involving Fiorini's behavior, which they said involved a personal situation they claimed was affecting public business. Hennessey said he was discussing the allegations against Fiorini because it might help explain Hennessey's own stance on some county issues." This leads me to believe the allegations against Fiorini are true and Hendricks is being thrown under the bus. That is the reason for my confusion.
|
|
|
|
Post by corner on Nov 6, 2009 12:02:20 GMT -5
Larry, I have been reading the articles. Other then the allegations mentioning you being involved in a blackmail scheme, (which would lead to a civil suit if you want to pursue charges against Hendricks for slander), I am confused on why all of a sudden the DA is investigating some thing that most of the legislators, including yourself, knew about before the election and didn't bring out or do anything about it. "In August, both Tanoury and Democratic Minority Leader Michael Hennessey, D-Sherill floated to reporters allegations involving Fiorini's behavior, which they said involved a personal situation they claimed was affecting public business. Hennessey said he was discussing the allegations against Fiorini because it might help explain Hennessey's own stance on some county issues." This leads me to believe the allegations against Fiorini are true and Hendricks is being thrown under the bus. That is the reason for my confusion. me thinks Hendricks threw himself under the bus sounds like Hill wasnt the only one hitting the bottle this week |
|
|
|
Post by bobbbiez on Nov 6, 2009 12:11:53 GMT -5
I don't see it that way. According to the article, Hendricks only did what Hennessey and Tanoury attempted to do last August. 
|
|
|
|
Post by Clipper on Nov 6, 2009 13:13:37 GMT -5
Fiorini's alleged indescretions aside, the blackmail allegations against Larry are just plain Bullshit! I know better than to even think that he would be as foolish as to attempt such a criminal act.
Nobody had to throw Hendricks under the bus. He CRAWLED under there on his own. What a dumbass. He simply is both bitter and corrupt, along with being a little on the stupid side. What politician in his right mind has a DISBARRED lawyer running his campaign?
The people spoke in that last election, and no matter how many cases of Colt 45 Hendricks bought, the people will speak again when the absentee ballots are counted. Hendricks has to employ mudslinging because he certainly can't run on his ACCOMPLISHMENTS!
I think maybe he has stirred a hornets nest that he can't run fast enough or far enough away from to keep from being stung!
|
|
|
|
Post by fiona on Nov 6, 2009 20:30:28 GMT -5
how do you personally know that she has a thing for older men with money?
|
|
|
|
Post by corner on Nov 6, 2009 21:19:47 GMT -5
personally knew some of her paramours and was a friend of her husband, but that was a whole page and several conversations ago the focus should be reallly on the current allegations against Larry and if the allegations of an affair with Fiorini are true and favors were granted then that should genratte a corruption investigation as well....bottom line is Hendricks and his cronies are casting mud and aspersions due to a very tight race which may get reversed when the absentee ballots get counted next week..Larry is hated by most legislators including those in his own party the fact that many have come to his support and the director of the charity allegedly benefitting by his supposed black mail has indicated she applied for the funds and had no help from him come on really now!!!!the real bad guys in this deal are Hendricks and Barry who distributed the letters to the various news media and the county folks in person and is now denying he did when he was at the tv station the county office bldg and several people have gone on record as having received the copies directly from him..as far asDV goes she is a single woman who has the right to "date" anybody she chooses and if she has a preferense for a particular type of individual more power to her..i'm an ass man myself but what the hey.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2009 5:25:15 GMT -5
Picente & the legistlature can put this whole lease question to rest quite easily. Picente claims that the State of NY requires a long term lease commitment between OC & Insight House to ensure state aid. Well, let's see some documentation to back up this claim. All the county has to do is to make public in some form or another the state's policy in regards to these type of lease arrangements. Personally, I find it hard to believe that the State of NY would tell OC to sign a 15-20 yr. lease with Insight House, but if that's the case then fine. But, prove it. And I find it suspect how Picente hurried up to sign the lease before the legistlature could do anything about it. The whole deal stinks to high heaven.
|
|
|
|
Post by corner on Nov 8, 2009 10:29:48 GMT -5
got to remember this deal was in place when paul was alive and running things they took over what would have been an un utilized bldng what i am concerned about is that they are now a monopoly, mancuso's is gone (pauls b=i=l) by the way and ole peterson is in prison
|
|
|
|
Post by Swimmy on Nov 8, 2009 20:51:17 GMT -5
Damn Clipper, I don't give a shit who is screwing who. The $30,000 was voted in by many whether the County could afford it or not it and is done and over with, so why all this other shit now? If anyone wants to sue for what was said about them, then let them hire their own attorney and sue as a private individual and in a Civil Court where it's no cost to the taxpayer. Especially if they honestly want to save the taxpayer more unnecessary spending.  Just for * and giggles, taxpayer monies pay for the courthouse to operate, the security, the court personnel and the judges to preside... ;-) |
|
|
|
Post by bobbbiez on Nov 8, 2009 23:38:12 GMT -5
Yeah Swimmy, but not as much of a cost in a civil suit. Sad, because we the taxpayer always gets it stuck in our dupas for other people's screw ups. Damned if we do and damned if we don't.
|
|
|
|
Post by Swimmy on Nov 9, 2009 7:35:43 GMT -5
That is why we should do it like in the old west. Duel it out with guns. Then the only thing the public has to pay for is the damage to any buildings from the bullet ricochets. The families would have to pay for the funerals. And we simultaneously cleanse the gene pool.  |
|
Larry, "exactly" what is the DA's office investigating? I am totally confused on that. 
