|
Post by dgriffin on Aug 23, 2009 22:48:43 GMT -5
Here's the full obit from the April 17, 1918 evening edition of the Utica Herald Dispatch. Hope you're not on dial up. This jpg file is 1.5 megabytes. Now would be a good time to mention to everyone that if you see something you like in any of the threads I post to on Clipper's forum, please download it to your own PC and don't depend on it always being here. I host these files on my webspace, not on Photobucket, and I have limited space. From time to time, I remove a lot of stuff, and you may see broken links. I try to not eliminate files on the historical threads and the Beyond Bebop thread, but my scalpel is not the finest.
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Aug 31, 2009 22:58:06 GMT -5
Continuing from John O'Grady's "Catholic Charities in America":
St. ]ohn’s Protectory, Buffalo
In Bishop Timon of Buffalo, Dr. Ives had another active co-worker in developing a protective program for Catholic boys. In 1861 Bishop Timon began to make plans for the care of boys who could not be provided for in the diocesan orphanage. With this purpose in mind he purchased a large farm at Limestone Hill in the present city of Lackawanna, where he erected St. John’s Protectory. In 1864 it was incorporated under the title of "Society for the Protection of Destitute Roman Catholic Children at the City of Buf- falo."’ It was placed under the direction of Rev. Thomas Hines, who was assisted by the Sisters of St. Joseph and who himself had experience as director of St. Joseph’s Orphan Asylum for Boys at Limestone Hill.” When Father Baker assumed charge of the institution in 1882 the name of St. John’s Protectory was changed to Our Lady of Victory Home. Father Baker upon assuming charge did more than merely change the name of the institution. He refashioned its whole program. Before his time St. John ’s Protectory had many of the aspects of an ordinary penal institution -- high walls, barred windows and rigid discipline. Father Baker very quickly liberalized the old methods of dis- cipline and restraint. Our Lady of Victory Home is now one of Father Baker ’s Lady of Victory charities. The other institutions that make up the group are: The Working Boys' Home, St. Joseph’s Orphan Boys’ Asylum, The Lady of Vic- tory Infant Home—a maternity hospital and a general hospital. The movement for the building of Catholic industrial schools was especially commended by the Second Plenary Council of Baltimore in 1856. "We, therefore," urged the Council, "earnestly exhort the bishops to defend with every possible care and solicitude the tender lambs of the Christian {old from the wolves that hang around them. Let them estab- lish industrial schools everywhere but especially in the great cities where the number of those in danger is 1arger."" This naturally gave impetus to the development of protectorates. Here was further evidence that Catholics were becoming more and more conscious of the losses that the Church was sus- taining through failure to make adequate provision for its neglected children. It must not be assumed, however, that the task of building these new institutions was an easy one. Catholics were, for the most part, still poor.
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Aug 31, 2009 22:59:33 GMT -5
Industrial Schools Established in Seventies and Eighties
Among the dioceses that established industrial schools in the period of 1810-1890 were St. Louis, San Francisco, Phila- delphia and St. Paul. In 1871 a Catholic protectorate was established at Glencoe, Missouri, in the archdiocese of St. Louis. Under the leadership of Rt. Rev. Patrick J. Ryan, later archbishop of Philadelphia, the protectory was at first successful , but later languished because of lack of support. The property was taken over later by the Christian Brothers who made it their novitiate under the title of La Salle Institute" About 1875 the city of San Francisco established a youth’s directory for the purpose of diminishing juvenile delinquency in the city. At first the agency contented itself to securing placement for children. Later its facilities were enlarged so as to enable it to care temporarily for children without suitable homes.” In 1886 the Mines Drexel purchased 200 acres of land near Bristol in the archdiocese of Philadel- phia for the purpose of providing a home and school for Catholic boys who could not be cared for in the ordinary orphan homes. The boys were to be prepared for the various trades and also for farming. The protcctory was to be in charge of the Christian Brothers."° An industrial school for boys was established in Clontarf, Minnesota, in the archdiocese of St. Paul about 1880.
From a reading of the contemporary literature of Catholic child-care it is very evident that those who were interested or engaged in the work did not draw clear lines of demarca- tion between the different types of children. Such literature as there is on Catholic child-care during this period pictures thousands of homeless, abandoned, destitute children roaming the streets and being grabbed up by Protestant agencies and sent to good Protestant homes in the middle west. The industrial schools represented a heroic effort to do something for these children. As was to be expected, the industrial school did not classify its charges. Its basic thought was to save them to the faith.
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Sept 1, 2009 20:17:19 GMT -5
Institutions Complementing the Industrial Schools
Side by side with the industrial schools, there was another group of institutions providing temporary care for homeless boys. In these the boy was to be retained until a perma- nent foster home could he found for him. A good illus- tration of this type of home is the Mission of the Immaculate Virgin, now located on Staten Island. It had its beginnings in St. Vincent's Newsboys’ Lodging Home opened by the St. Vincent de Paul Society on Warren Street, New York City, in 1870. While still a layman the Rev. John C. Drumgoole had become acquainted with the work of the St. Vincent de Paul Society. After ordination he asked Archbishop McCloskey of New York to permit him to dedicate his life to the care of homeless and destitute boys. In 1873 he took over St. Vincent’s Newsboys’ Lodging Home from the St. Vincent de Paul Society. Within a period of four years the demand on this institution became so great that Father Drumgoole was obliged to acquire a larger house on Lafayette Place.
Father Drumgoole was not long satisfied with the develop- ment of a working boys’ home. He visioned a village com- munity in which a large number of children of both sexes could be brought together under the care of sisters. As a part. of his program he acquired a farm on Staten Island where he gradually developed his village community. As a means of supporting the project, he organized St. Joseph 's Union, which very quickly drew a large membership from the entire country.”
In a letter addressed to Cardinal McCloskey in April, 1884, Father Drumgoole tells about the opening of the new build- ings on Staten Island the previous Thanksgiving Day. On this occasion 700 children visited Mt. Loretto. In the eve- ning 400 larger boys returned to the house on Lafayette Place, leaving 300 in the new institution. Father Drum- goole stated that plans were under way for the care of home- less boys on Staten Island in accordance with the original purpose of his foundation. At the mission in Lafayette Place fifty people daily received free meals. Relief was also given to families in their homes.
The example set by the St. Vincent ds Paul Society and Father Drumgoole in New York inspired Catholics in a number of other cities. In 1871 Rev. Maurice Hickey estab- lished St. Vineent’s Home for Newsboys in Brooklyn. The home, however, did not confine its efforts to newsboys. It received any boy who was in want. While it was intended primarily for working boys, it also received a number of boys under working age. It was Father Hickey ’a plan to provide permanent foster homes for homeless boys as soon as possible.
A lodging house for Catholic boys, known as St. Vincent 'a Home, was established in Newark in 1882. The establish- ment of the Newark institution was due to the activities of the "Boys’ Lodging House and Chlldren's Aid Society" in winning Catholic boys away from the Church." ‘° Fully one- half of the boys cared for by this agency were children of Irish Catholics. All the children were compelled to attend Protestant services. In 1883 a Catholic working boys' home was opened in Boston."
John O'Grady, "Catholic Charities In America," 1971
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Sept 1, 2009 21:06:50 GMT -5
Got to thinking as I was posting the above.
As I trudged up Sunset Ave with a canvas bag now empty of the last edition of The Observer Dispatch, I never realized I was marching along in the tradition of orphan boys 100 years before who eked out a living selling newspapers. I was not an orphan, but the Rev. Mrs. Gasek ... her husband the pastor of Utica’s Grace Church ... may have thought so when I came to her door collecting for a week of papers on a wintry evening in 1955. When the storm was over, it would turn out to be one of the city’s worst blizzards of the decade. Over 5 feet of snow fell. Hey, what was a little bit of snow to me! I was an eleven year old son of Utica, born in a blizzard so I was told.
The Gaseks were the last customer on my route, and they lived in a comfortable house on the corner of Sunset Ave. and Newell Street, just three blocks from my home. As the wind rattled the window panes and snow built up on their front porch, climbing its way to the window bottoms, the pastor’s wife opened her front door and beheld young Dave, swaddled in six layers of clothing (none matching) and probably missing one glove, as was often the case in those days. "Forty cents, please," squeaked out from my midget apparition while the snow swirled past me and blasted the poor woman, poised there resembling a windblown Donna Reed. The Reverend was just arriving home, having had a harrowing drive up Genesee Street from his church. I would not accept her offer to step inside. After all, they were as Protestant as one (or two) could get, he being the minister of the downtown church. She insisted her husband take me home in his car. He looked a bit rattled but indicated he was game. I declined that offer also, not wanting to be dropped off in front of my home by a non-Catholic clergyman, even in the middle of a howling storm of biblical proportions. I tried to withdraw from the porch, back into the eye of the storm. Mrs. Gasek refused to let go of my arm, her feet firmly planted on the threshold as she stood freezing in her doorway. I could see the snow building up on her black woolen dress. The Reverend Mr. Gasek, perhaps hearing a whisper from the Holy Spirit, was suddenly inspired. Asking my phone number, he called my mother and asked her permission. She was embarrassed, but assented, and I rode home in a wonderfully warm and commodious black Buick. I was so comfortable when we arrived in front of my house, I was ready to turn Protestant and forsake the faith of my fathers.
The only mention of the episode that evening was from my father. "That was very nice of the Gaseks,” he said. “But the next time it snows so hard, come right home." Yeah, sure, OK Dad.
I suppose it's unnecessary to say the Gaseks were terrifically nice people. But I remained Catholic a few more years.
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Sept 4, 2009 21:32:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Sept 4, 2009 21:39:15 GMT -5
More from John O'Grady's "Catholic Charities in America":
Catholic Industrial School Movement Lauguishes After 1885
After 1885 the movement for the organization of Catholic industrial schools and working boys’ homes began to languish. This was probably due in part to the difficulties that had arisen in maintaining the existing institutions. It was also due in part to the difficulty of finding the necessary personnel. Catholic leaders were beginning to understand more clearly that the institution was only a partial solution of the prob- lem. They began to realize more and more that institutions alone could not save Catholic children, hut that the children had to be reached primarily through their homes and through the parochial schools. The Church had barely learned to deal with the older immigration, when it was called upon to deal with the tide of the new immigration. Hundreds of thousands of immi- grants from the Catholic countries of southern and eastern Europe were poured into this country every year. A large part of the energy and resources of the Church were con- sumed in providing religious instruction and worship for these new immigrants.
Catholic Industrial Schools After 1900
Since 1900 a number of new industrial schools have been established. In 1909 the State Council, Knights of Columbus of Indiana, opened an industrial school for boys in Indianap- olis. In 1917 Father Flanagan began s home for boys under his name in Omaha. In 1916 Bishop Hoban of Scranton established St. Michael 's Industrial School at Hoban Heights, Pennsylvania. In 1920 the St. Vincent de Paul Society founded an industrial school for boys in Milwaukee. In 1921 Father Wynhoven opened his new institution, Hope Haven, at 1[arrero, Louisiana. The institutions at Indianapolis and Milwaukee were intended primarily for delinquent boys. Hope Haven is s vocational school for boys who have graduated from the orphanage; in New Orleans. It is planned eventually to expand the institution so as to care for all the children requiring special attention in the srchdiocese of New Orleans. St. Michael ’s Industrial School at Hoban Heights, Pennsyl- vania, is for problem boys. It does not accept boys who have been seriously delinquent. The institutions that have been established since 1900 have grown out of peculiar local situa- tions. They do not represent a national movement like the protectories of the earlier period. In fact, there is no longer the old interest in protectories that was manifested forty or fifty years ago.
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Sept 5, 2009 19:04:21 GMT -5
The datedness of the following caused me to go back and check the reference of the book I've been quoting. I have the author correct (Monsignor John O'Grady,) the title somewhat correct and the date all wrong! It was written in 1930 and the book's title is "Catholic Charities In The United States," printed by Ransdell Press, New York. I think the work has appeared alone, as well as a section in larger books, which may have been the reason for my confusion.
So, this excerpt and then one final paragraph of summation by O'Grady.
Problem of Personnel
During the past few years the problem of personnel for Catholic institutions for older boys has become acute. There is a question as to whether or not we can depend on the sisters to take care of older boys. The various hrotherhoods who did such splendid pioneer work in developing Catholic indus- trial schools, are diverting their attention to the educational field. We have, therefore, been finding it difficult to supply the proper personnel for some of our welfare institutions. It is quite apparent that the various dioceses can not look to the hrotherhoods to take charge of their children’s institutions. So far as the ordinary institution for dependent children is concerned, the problem is not so serious. The sisterhoods have been willing to take over the institutions of this type which the brothers were compelled to leave. The new demands on the brotherhoods have, however, made the problem of operat- ing Catholic homes for older boys exceedingly acute, as a lay personnel is going to be quite expensive. The problem of personnel has given rise to the question as to whether or not the various dioceses should proceed further with the development of industrial schools. In fact, there has been a serious question as to whether the existing insti- tutions should be continued. An increasing number of per- sons believe that it is not practicable for the Church in the ordinary American diocese to provide an institutional pro- gram for the care of delinquent children. They believe that as a matter of practical policy the Church must surrender this to the state. The question has been raised by many students of juvenile delinquency as to whether or not the resources of the Church would not be more effective in developing a preventive pro- gram for juvenile delinquency rather than in developing an institutional program for delinquents. From everyday ex- perience one finds that the children who come before the juvenile courts have had no religious training. Would it not be better to see that such children have religious training rather than try to care for them after their delinquency!
|
|
|
Post by fiona on Sept 5, 2009 19:56:19 GMT -5
Dave; great work, but let's get down to the bones of this thing: As we all know ,it all goes back to the Catholic Churches absolute ban on birth control. In Irish families the best thing that could happen is for the son to become a priest, but not for the daughter to become a nun. If the daughter went into the sisterhood then the generations were cut off, but if the son became a priest, that was the highest honor. I have never understood that. The church, by sanctioning large (13 or more was not uncommon) families created the problem of abandonded children. And these children were everywhere, swarming, living on the streets, orphaned, begging. What did the Church expect? In my mind all the church wanted to do was increase the priesthood, by encouraging Catholic families, particularaly the Irish, to have more and more children. To call these children delinquint was the greater sin. They weren't born that way, but many many thousands had no options. I think going into a" good Protestant home" was probebly the lesser of two evils. I often think about the story you wrote about the boys who ran away from St. Vincent's in Utica in the middle of winter and froze to death. These " huge industrial schools" were just the 19th century version of debtors prisons and workhouses for children. The Church created the problem and then tried to solve it by blaming the children through labaling them as "vagrant delinquints whose souls were in need of saving." and what could a child do, then, who aged out at 16 and was throughly "institutionalized"? Could they function in society? What did the girls do- go uptown and " do for the quality"? Get married an dproduce more little Catholics? And how about the boys? Did they go into the mills? Or down into the coal mines? By rounding up these children the church kept a steady supply of low income, low leval workers to feed the 19th century industrial machine. I don't think there were very many young Horatio Algers coming out of these work houses and farms.
Great work, Dave.
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Sept 5, 2009 23:01:47 GMT -5
Good points, Fiona. You might want to read my story, "Aul'Wan Sue," at: www.windsweptpress.com/sue.pdfIt's the story of a young Utica woman whose early life in the first quarter of the 20th century was spent in East Utica, at the opposite end of the world from Genesee Hill. It's not factual history, but a mostly true account of actual events in the life of my family. Re Monsignor O'Grady's book, I'm sure the furthest thing from his mind was the culpability of the Church in providing the fodder for the Newsboy Homes and Industrial Schools. How could the Church be responsible for vagrant children when it was God Himself who ordered the faithful to go forward and multiply? Or something like that. Large families killed Ireland, in a sense. Even before the British invaded the Old Sod, having to divide the land up among all the sons (forget the daughters!) made for shrinking farms and family incomes. In an effort to limit family size, men married late. Women didn't live very long in such a primitive rural society, so the old men married young women, but girls were made old women pretty quick. I won't argue it, but something rings a bell in the back of my mind about the Irish always having a a tradition of large families, even before they were converted to Christianity. More help with the harvest, possibly. In America, the practice continued, but not with all the Irish. In my family, there is a direct correlation going back to the 1824, at least, between family size and socio-economics. Even among brothers. The ones who could easily afford many had few, and those who were poor had many. Makes about as much sense as what we see at the bottom of the economic ladder today.
|
|
|
Post by fiona on Sept 6, 2009 20:10:25 GMT -5
Dave; I was so taken away by your story I completly lost track of time and space and I was there! I will comment more very soon.
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Sept 7, 2009 19:50:18 GMT -5
A Preventive Program for Juvenile Delinquency
In order to prevent juvenile delinquency one must reach its sources which are generally found in the home life. The juvenile delinquent usually has no religious training, as he ordinarily comes from a home without religious standards. For the children who can not he reached by a preventive program it would seem that in most dioceses, as a matter of practical policy, one must look to the public institutions. These institutions, it must be noted, have changed their attitude entirely towards religious training since the days when the first protectories were established. They now seek Catholic cooperation. They welcome any program of religions training, and we have only ourselves to blame it delinquent and semi-delinquent Catholic children in public institutions do not receive some measure of religious training. Homes for working boys no longer fill thc same need as forty years ago. The newsboy and the bootblack are either in their own homes or in school. Very few homes for working boys have, therefore, been established in recent years. The only two of recent origin are Father Duune’s Newsboys’ Home in St. Louis and St. Anthony’s Home for Boys in Cleveland. Father Dunne’s Home was originally intended for newsboys, but has really become an ordinary institution for dependent children. St. Anthony’s Home cares for boys who have been discharged from the diocesan orphanage until such time as they are able to adjust themselves. It provides a center to which the boys can return when they are out of work or when various difficulties arise. In this way the home serves a useful purpose. Many of the older working boys' homes have followed the same drift as Father Dunne’s Newsboys' Home.
Monsignor John O'Grady, "Catholic Charities In The United States," Ransdell, New York, 1930.
end no more
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Sept 7, 2009 19:58:28 GMT -5
I thought it interesting to trace a charities "project," from initial supposition to final conclusion. It shows how an organization saw a problem (to their eyes), mounted a solution and concluded that their ideas didn't work. Of course, the world was also changing in the meanwhile. This, and the known abuse problems in such homes, doesn't take away totally from the lives saved and careers launched by the Brothers as they cared for their wards.
You would think some of us would have met or heard about men who were graduates of St. Vincent's Industrial School on lower Conkling and Rutger Streets, and were living in Utica in the 50's or even '60's. But I never did.
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Sept 11, 2009 21:38:14 GMT -5
Click twice using Firefox. Not sure how to do it with other browsers, but there's a way to double enlarge it. It's then quite readable (except the sidebar on the right.)www.windsweptpress.com/images/lifes other.jpg[/img]
|
|
|
Post by fiona on Sept 12, 2009 20:53:50 GMT -5
This artical is very Victorian and guaranteed to draw years from a rock. What boy does not, in the end, even though he's been beaten, starved and put away for years in an orphan asylum, love his mother?
|
|