|
Post by clarencebunsen on Sept 12, 2012 18:14:04 GMT -5
I was all set to download this spelling /grammar / context checker until I got to the last correction in the video (about the 1 minute mare).
|
|
|
Post by dave on Sept 12, 2012 20:38:51 GMT -5
I guess I missed it. What was the problem?
|
|
|
Post by clarencebunsen on Sept 12, 2012 20:59:30 GMT -5
I thought the as corrected version ("His abundant use of poetic license is to the detriment of his work.") was very awkward, as if it was written by a person who is not a native speaker of English.
|
|
|
Post by dave on Sept 12, 2012 22:17:04 GMT -5
What makes say you that?
|
|
|
Post by clarencebunsen on Sept 14, 2012 11:45:10 GMT -5
Not fair, you made me think. My first choice in the sentence would be "is detrimental to." I had to think even more when I heard a newscaster say, "redounds to the credit of." I don't think I have ever used "redounds" but if I were to use it I would probably use the newscaster's construction.
After running a few phrases through my head, I believe I would use my construction with linking verbs. I have to think a bit more to determine if I have a reason or if I'm controlled by habit.
|
|
|
Post by dave on Sept 14, 2012 14:59:21 GMT -5
I still remember in Latin it was nouns followed by verbs. In high school, we practiced it on each other with, "The bus coming it is" and "A** my kiss." There were others. But your "... if I have a reason or if I'm controlled by habit," prompts me to say we get our constructions from our reading. I suppose it's from our habitual reading. Those phrases we don't mess up. I'm trying to think of the word for getting a phrase wrong. Like, "All I want for Christmas is my two front feet."
|
|
|
Post by clarencebunsen on Sept 14, 2012 15:59:33 GMT -5
Is there a word for that? It is not exactly a Spoonerism. (It is kisstomary to cuss the bride.) I had a friend who frequently said, "We have to nip that in the butt."
|
|
|
Post by dave on Sept 14, 2012 19:30:53 GMT -5
Yes, Spoonerism was what I was trying to recall. A loose Spoonerism then.
|
|