Post by Clipper on Jul 14, 2011 12:13:45 GMT -5
Roefaro objects to criticism of possible EDGE partnership
07/14/2011 01:53:00 am Marques Phillips/Utica Daily News
UTICA, July 13, 2011 -- Utica Mayor David Roefaro took exception to a resolution introduced to the Common Council and authored by Councilman Frank Vescera (D-1) that would urge the mayor not to partner the city's Urban and Economic Development Department with Mohawk Valley EDGE.
Since Randy Soggs stepped down earlier this month, the position is now vacant. Vescera's resolution sited media reports that Mohawk Valley EDGE may partner with the city through the new office in an effort to consolidate and take a regional approach to the position. It criticized EDGE for having made progress in Rome, but none in Utica although it gets county funding and is a regional body. The resolution said that having one person represent two offices with different missions would present a conflict of interest.
"Be it resolved that the Common Council of the City of Utica suggests that the mayor of the City of Utica consider the temporary appointment of a Commissioner of Urban and Economic Development rather than consider a partnership with an organization who by its very existence is in direct competition with the needs of the City of Utica."
Roefaro took exception with the resolution, and said if officials questioned his approach to filling the position, they could have just called him.
"There's all of this speculation, nobody ever seems to call and ask me about it," he said.
The mayor said that losing Soggs was a blow to the city and that he has been working to keep the department running. He also said that he's aware that he'll be out office in six months and his successor may choose to go in a different direction. Roefaro also promised that he would have an announcement regarding the vacant position by the end of the week.
"You didn't want to ask me, that's o.k.," he said. "It doesn't matter, you'll know what's going to happen by the end of the week."
Roefaro said that the appointment was one for the executive branch to make and not the Common Council. The mayor also leveled a general criticism of city officials, saying they only like to talk about things like consolidation but back away when it comes to taking action.
"We like to talk about cooperation and consolidation, but only if it's with an agency you like," Roefaro said.
The resolution was sent to committee and wasn't voted on by the Council on Wednesday.
I don't live there, and I guess I don't know all the history but why would a lame duck mayor want to partner with an outside entity, when there is a capability right within the city already, that seems to be quite competent and capable of doing the job?
EDGE has a notorious reputation for favoring only the ROME area and their own interests.
Is the Mayor by chance feathering some sort of a nest for when he leaves office? Seems to me that the last thing Utica needs is to throw in with EDGE or allow them to have any input into spending Utica's grant moneys. They have proved over the years to be heavily prejudicial to the Utica area while promoting the rest of the county.
What's the local taxpayer's view of this proposal?
07/14/2011 01:53:00 am Marques Phillips/Utica Daily News
UTICA, July 13, 2011 -- Utica Mayor David Roefaro took exception to a resolution introduced to the Common Council and authored by Councilman Frank Vescera (D-1) that would urge the mayor not to partner the city's Urban and Economic Development Department with Mohawk Valley EDGE.
Since Randy Soggs stepped down earlier this month, the position is now vacant. Vescera's resolution sited media reports that Mohawk Valley EDGE may partner with the city through the new office in an effort to consolidate and take a regional approach to the position. It criticized EDGE for having made progress in Rome, but none in Utica although it gets county funding and is a regional body. The resolution said that having one person represent two offices with different missions would present a conflict of interest.
"Be it resolved that the Common Council of the City of Utica suggests that the mayor of the City of Utica consider the temporary appointment of a Commissioner of Urban and Economic Development rather than consider a partnership with an organization who by its very existence is in direct competition with the needs of the City of Utica."
Roefaro took exception with the resolution, and said if officials questioned his approach to filling the position, they could have just called him.
"There's all of this speculation, nobody ever seems to call and ask me about it," he said.
The mayor said that losing Soggs was a blow to the city and that he has been working to keep the department running. He also said that he's aware that he'll be out office in six months and his successor may choose to go in a different direction. Roefaro also promised that he would have an announcement regarding the vacant position by the end of the week.
"You didn't want to ask me, that's o.k.," he said. "It doesn't matter, you'll know what's going to happen by the end of the week."
Roefaro said that the appointment was one for the executive branch to make and not the Common Council. The mayor also leveled a general criticism of city officials, saying they only like to talk about things like consolidation but back away when it comes to taking action.
"We like to talk about cooperation and consolidation, but only if it's with an agency you like," Roefaro said.
The resolution was sent to committee and wasn't voted on by the Council on Wednesday.
I don't live there, and I guess I don't know all the history but why would a lame duck mayor want to partner with an outside entity, when there is a capability right within the city already, that seems to be quite competent and capable of doing the job?
EDGE has a notorious reputation for favoring only the ROME area and their own interests.
Is the Mayor by chance feathering some sort of a nest for when he leaves office? Seems to me that the last thing Utica needs is to throw in with EDGE or allow them to have any input into spending Utica's grant moneys. They have proved over the years to be heavily prejudicial to the Utica area while promoting the rest of the county.
What's the local taxpayer's view of this proposal?