|
Post by dgriffin on Mar 15, 2009 17:14:41 GMT -5
ABC NewsWidespread Backlash Over AIG BonusesAnger Builds Over Big Bonuses Paid to Execs of Taxpayer-Funded CompanyThe Obama administration had one word today for insurance giant AIG's plans to award senior executives hundreds of millions of dollars in bonuses and retention pay: "outrageous." President Barack Obama's chief economics adviser Lawrence Summers commented on insurance giant American International Group's plan to award senior executives hundreds of millions of dollars in bonuses and retention pay. Today in Washington, others had a lot more to say. "There are a lot of terrible things that have happened in the last 18 months, but what's happened at AIG is the most outrageous," Lawrence Summers, chairman of the White House National Economic Council, said this morning on ABC's "This Week With George Stephanopoulos. "What that company did, the way it was not regulated, the way no one was watching, what's proved necessary, it is outrageous." Summers repeated the characterization several times on the morning talk show circuit. Lawmakers, too, are furious at the payout of big bonuses at a company that has so far eaten up $170 billion in taxpayer money, and whose risky behavior has helped push the economy into one of the biggest financial crises in American history. abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=7087396&page=1Well, let us hear all the breast beating. But the bonuses WILL be paid, of course.
|
|
|
Post by Swimmy on Mar 16, 2009 12:47:57 GMT -5
like that was a big surprise...
funny though, the democrats covered up the fanni mae lending practices for years... but everybody loves a democrat!
|
|
|
Post by concerned on Mar 17, 2009 10:06:16 GMT -5
I read that Obama is having his team find a way to block the bonuses. Can the federal government interfer in private business that way? I was wondering because if it can do that to them then they should do the same for everyone else.
|
|
|
Post by frankcor on Mar 17, 2009 10:50:39 GMT -5
Obama's administration is playing us like a harp. Doesn't it seem this story was elevated once again to stir up anti-business sentiment in order to gain support for an upcoming new round of government spending increases (bailouts)? Don't be surprised when we hear the other shoe drop in the next week or two.
|
|
|
Post by frankcor on Mar 17, 2009 11:30:42 GMT -5
Perhaps this will help to make a little more sense out of this for everyone: AIG political contribution recipientsTop of the list? Senator Chris Dodd who successfully inserted an ammendement into the stimulus package that exempted the AIG bonuses from the law that would have banned them. The same bonuses he is pretending to be angry about today. When it doubt, follow the money.
|
|
|
Post by concerned on Mar 18, 2009 9:46:48 GMT -5
When I looked at the partial list of the businesses that AIG paid its bailout money to I was surprised that each of them also received billions in bailout money. Where they bailout twice?
|
|
|
Post by frankcor on Mar 18, 2009 13:30:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by clarencebunsen on Mar 18, 2009 19:48:49 GMT -5
Last Tuesday, as President Obama got off the helicopter in front of the White House, he was carrying a baby piglet under each arm.
The squared away Marine guard snaps to attention, salutes and says: "Nice pigs, Sir."
The President replies: "These are not pigs... these are authentic Arkansas Razorback Hogs. I got one for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and I got one for Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi."
The squared away Marine again snaps to attention, salutes and says, "Excellent trade, Sir.”
(I'm sorry. As soon as I finish my reading list I'll grow up & stop all this nonsense, I promise.)
|
|
|
Post by bobbbiez on Mar 18, 2009 21:52:30 GMT -5
Don't worry about growing up just yet. That was pretty damn funny. Personally, I also think it was a great trade.
|
|
|
Post by frankcor on Mar 18, 2009 22:51:33 GMT -5
Go Hogs!
|
|
|
Post by clarencebunsen on Mar 19, 2009 5:55:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by frankcor on Mar 19, 2009 7:41:01 GMT -5
That's beautiful. I wish I had seen Obama thanking himself for the wonderful party he threw for himself.
Why do you need a teleprompter to make remarks at a party?
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Mar 19, 2009 10:10:00 GMT -5
That's beautiful. I wish I had seen Obama thanking himself for the wonderful party he threw for himself. Why do you need a teleprompter to make remarks at a party?Oh, come, come! The most powerful man in the world (aside from Angela Merkel, and she's not a man ... yet) can't play dice with even a so-called informal speech. A statesman is never impromptu. No doubt it's Gitmo for Mr. Teleprompter.
|
|
|
Post by frankcor on Mar 19, 2009 13:43:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Mar 19, 2009 14:06:02 GMT -5
Hahahahaha! That's cool.
|
|