|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2021 20:38:52 GMT -5
Poor Nancy will she ever get through this: Pelosi says part of Capitol Hill security issue is 'the enemy is within the House of Representatives' House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters Thursday that she's committed to addressing the concerns of her colleagues over security but said that effort is hampered because "the enemy is within the House of Representatives," referencing the rhetoric and behavior of some Republican members of Congress. Pelosi was asked about how members are concerned for their own security in the wake of the Capitol attack and violent rhetoric from other members, following a letter more than 30 lawmakers signed asking for more flexibility regarding the use of congressional allowance for personal security in their home districts and other security related requests. Pelosi also cited a security review currently being conducted by retired Lt. General Russel Honoré, with whom she met on Thursday to receive an initial assessment. www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pelosi-says-part-of-capitol-hill-security-issue-is-the-enemy-is-within-the-house-of-representatives/ar-BB1db1QT?li=BBnb7KzShe ain't seen nothing yet I believe. Remember: A house divided against itself shall NOT stand. Plain and simple they thought with Trump out all would be sane. Nope the fun begins. And yesterday we hear about domestic violence warning. We are in for an attack from within aided by forces always hidden but now exposed.
|
|
|
Post by BHU on Jan 29, 2021 18:25:33 GMT -5
Poor Nancy will she ever get through this: Pelosi says part of Capitol Hill security issue is 'the enemy is within the House of Representatives' House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters Thursday that she's committed to addressing the concerns of her colleagues over security but said that effort is hampered because "the enemy is within the House of Representatives," referencing the rhetoric and behavior of some Republican members of Congress. Pelosi was asked about how members are concerned for their own security in the wake of the Capitol attack and violent rhetoric from other members, following a letter more than 30 lawmakers signed asking for more flexibility regarding the use of congressional allowance for personal security in their home districts and other security related requests. Pelosi also cited a security review currently being conducted by retired Lt. General Russel Honoré, with whom she met on Thursday to receive an initial assessment. www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pelosi-says-part-of-capitol-hill-security-issue-is-the-enemy-is-within-the-house-of-representatives/ar-BB1db1QT?li=BBnb7KzShe ain't seen nothing yet I believe. Remember: A house divided against itself shall NOT stand. Plain and simple they thought with Trump out all would be sane. Nope the fun begins. And yesterday we hear about domestic violence warning. We are in for an attack from within aided by forces always hidden but now exposed. That don't sound like fun to me. Where I worked if an employee made a remark about putting a bullet in someone's head their ass would have been fired on the spot & escorted out the door post haste by police. Pelosi & other House & Senate members from both parties have every right to be concerned considering an angry mob a couple weeks ago was looking for them in that building to murder them. How'd you like it if that happened in YOUR building, PB?
|
|
|
Post by Clipper on Jan 29, 2021 19:14:50 GMT -5
I guess it is different when the rhetoric is coming from republicans. The anti republican rhetoric was quite prevalent during the last 4 yrs with hints that someone should assassinate the president, as well as other disturbing outlandish remarks and and suggestions eluding to violence against republicans and the president.
Bottom line is that in the past four years neither Pelosi or Schumer has ever made a statement or held a news conference, or done and interview without accusing the republicans of being responsible for any violence that has happened. The insinuation that a republican congressman or senator would carry out violent attacks against a fellow elected official is far fetched nonsense and paranoid fear mongering on her part.
The enemy is within? Way to foster unity and cooperation Nancy. What an irresponsible fool .
|
|
|
Post by BHU on Jan 29, 2021 21:08:50 GMT -5
I sure do hope those aliens don't blast US here in CNY with any lasers from outer space. And yessiree, that Parkland school shooting was "staged". Maybe the parents should look into where their kids are at.
Al Franken should run for the Senate again after he resigned under pressure when a pic surfaced of him acting like a juvenille delinquint during his SNL days. If a QUANON conspiracy minded nut job who advocates for putting a bullet in speaker Pelosi's head is aok by the GOP then I think we can tolerate Franken for acting like a jerk during his comedic days 10 years ago.
|
|
|
Post by clarencebunsen on Jan 30, 2021 22:24:04 GMT -5
Franken was funny but was also a sexual predator. I think he should have been prosecuted not allowed to get off with a hand slap. He had no qualifications for the Senate.
|
|
|
Post by artsyone on Jan 31, 2021 9:49:54 GMT -5
FYI: I heard this morning Trump's entire legal team has quit. Any updates appreciated.
|
|
|
Post by BHU on Jan 31, 2021 9:56:09 GMT -5
FYI: I heard this morning Trump's entire legal team has quit. Any updates appreciated. They expected to be paid for their services. Trump is talking about representing himself so he can rant about his bogus election fraud scam, turn it nto a sideshow & be the center of attention.
|
|
|
Post by artsyone on Jan 31, 2021 12:05:49 GMT -5
They expected to be paid for their services?? How very unusual in rarified world of Post Trump Rudy Guliani.ism. Paid?? I think not.
|
|
|
Post by Clipper on Jan 31, 2021 12:43:15 GMT -5
Actually two of his attorneys were fired because he didn't think they would "represent his best interests." I don't know if ANYONE but him could represent HIS best interests, since he is the only one who knows what they are from one day to the next, haha.
The LAST candidate that I would want representing me would be Rudy. He has become a slime ball over the years. HE is the one that mentioned "combat" in his speech to the protestors. I am surprised that no one has gone after his law license or proposed prosectuting HIM.
|
|
|
Post by BHU on Jan 31, 2021 14:14:46 GMT -5
Guiliani is also being sued by Dominion for $1 billion dollars & may be sued by The Lincoln Project for remarks tying them to the riots which is nonsense. Guiliani was always a slimeball who's been milking 9/11 since the day he left office in N.Y.C. He was also married to his own cousin. A real class act. Lol
|
|
|
Post by Clipper on Jan 31, 2021 18:41:16 GMT -5
I read this morning that two had been fired. I just read a couple hours ago that in fact the rest quit. He actually did quite a bit for NYC while he was mayor, but he certainly has become desperate for attention since then. Married his cousin? I guess he must think he is in the mountains of West Virginia or Kentucky.
|
|
|
Post by BHU on Feb 1, 2021 17:12:59 GMT -5
I read this morning that two had been fired. I just read a couple hours ago that in fact the rest quit. He actually did quite a bit for NYC while he was mayor, but he certainly has become desperate for attention since then. Married his cousin? I guess he must think he is in the mountains of West Virginia or Kentucky. I think good old Rudy had the marriage annulled claiming he didn't know his wife of 14 years was his cousin. Yea ok.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2021 20:10:04 GMT -5
I had a friend whose Mom married her first cousin. Now that is not permitted in the Catholic Church since according to Cannot Law it is consanguinity in the first degree. In case you all are interested here is a reference which is a great resource from my days of learning Cannon Law: www.vatican.va/archive/cod-iuris-canonici/eng/documents/cic_lib4-cann998-1165_en.html#TITLE_VII. Also this can unpack applying laws: canonlawmadeeasy.com/2010/09/09/can-cousins-marry-in-the-church/ Are you confused? I always was. Even after sitting in on a Marriage Tribunal dealing with this issue. I seem to know a lot of worthless stuff. LOL PS: His parents married anyway. Paid the Bishop big funds. The Bishop even performed ( witnessed ) the marriage. I say witnessed since in any Christian denomination a marriage is sacramentalised between the two whom are getting married. The clergy member and bestman and bridesmaid are only needed for validation purposes. Reminds me of a marriage that I was at when a person whom had been living together for a good 20 or more years. Tsik tisk not good! I can't remember decided to enter into marriage. I was the best man and our cook at the time was the maid of honor(LOL). I don't even remember who they were but I bet Monsignor does. Except he is now dead.
|
|