|
Post by Clipper on Jul 10, 2009 11:34:15 GMT -5
They say they will bury Jacksons casket in concrete to prevent fans from digging him up.
Those of us that are NOT Jackson fans might rest assured knowing that as a suspected pedophile HE WILL STAY PUT.
With the horrific mess surrounding the black cemetery in suburban Chicago, I don't blame them for wanting to insure that he is anchored well enough to prevent his being moved. I don't know why anyone would WANT to dig him up though, unless they wanted to use his deformed nose for a can opener.
What is the big deal? He was a talented musician, but he met the end that many illicit drug users meet. He was not stupid. He must have been completely aware of the game of russian roulette that he played with all the drugs he played with. The final straw was the propofol that was totally inappropriate for home use. He got what he deserved. He did hard drugs and he croaked. With his money, rehab would have been a much better alternative, but you have to WANT to quit the drugs.
His life circled the bowl for many years and finally found the drain. My sympathy is with his children and his mom. I don't include his dad because I understand that he was at the root of a lot of Michael's emotional problems.
It is a sad end to a sad story, but jeez, I am sick of hearing about it on television. Farrah Faucet's death was much more meaningful and sad, and she got shit for coverage on tv.
We have lost a great musical talent, and we will watch months of coverage of his wierd private life, and will see his despicable drug dealing doctors tried and convicted of their crimes and misdeeds. In the meantime, other, more deserving deceased stars have been buried, services held, and will be soon only a memory of their most avid fans.
Jackson's death deserved about the level of coverage that was given to the guy that was found hanging with a rope from his winky to his neck. Dead, gone, forgotten.
|
|
|
Post by corner on Jul 10, 2009 11:53:48 GMT -5
they should drive a stake through his heart first to make sure he stays down.....i think the concrete is to make sure the pcb's from his artificial body dont leach into the water table>
|
|
|
Post by Clipper on Jul 10, 2009 12:09:25 GMT -5
You are right about that too Corner. I just find it sad that this is the type of Icon that is offered up to our children for them to idolize.
Many stars are "eccentric" but Michael Jackson was just plain weird and perverse. What else can be said about a man that was married twice to attractive women, and yet had to have them artificially inseminated. What other man would rather sleep with children or a chimpanzee than to sleep with Elvis Presley's daughter? What kind of a father makes his kids wear veils when in public and hangs their infant from a balcony?
Eddie Hanna was eccentric. Howard Hughes was eccentric. Michael Jackson was simply a deviated little drug addict with some very perverse desires. His fame and money are the only things that kept him from being bent over a prison bunk by Bubba in a state penitentiary somewhere.
I was surprised that somewhere along the line, PETA wasn't publicly outraged by his sleeping with a chimp. That poor animal was probably subjected to some really weird stuff and paid with bananas. LOLOL
|
|
|
Post by corner on Jul 10, 2009 14:33:05 GMT -5
if the best idols these days folks have to offer are a one eyed drug taking governer a marxist in the white house and a pedohylic entertainer boy are we doomed as a society...Duck people the asteroid is coming!
|
|
|
Post by corner on Jul 10, 2009 14:37:05 GMT -5
You are right about that too Corner. I just find it sad that this is the type of Icon that is offered up to our children for them to idolize. Many stars are "eccentric" but Michael Jackson was just plain weird and perverse. What else can be said about a man that was married twice to attractive women, and yet had to have them artificially inseminated. What other man would rather sleep with children or a chimpanzee than to sleep with Priscilla Presley? What kind of a father makes his kids wear veils when in public and hangs their infant from a balcony? Eddie Hanna was eccentric. Howard Hughes was eccentric. Michael Jackson was simply a deviated little drug addict with some very perverse desires. His fame and money are the only things that kept him from being bent over a prison bunk by Bubba in a state penitentiary somewhere. I was surprised that somewhere along the line, PETA wasn't publicly outraged by his sleeping with a chimp. That poor animal was probably subjected to some really weird stuff and paid with bananas. LOLOL I read somewhere that elvis had a trained chimp and that got priscilla to....................you get the picture!Then there is Terry Hatcher and her dog found in a compromising situation on the set of Lois and Clark...stars and hollywood types are usually very egocentric people who let their appetites control them.
|
|
|
Post by jon hynes on Jul 10, 2009 15:06:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by corner on Jul 10, 2009 15:37:42 GMT -5
most excellent jon
|
|
|
Post by sleepy47 on Jul 10, 2009 21:15:31 GMT -5
Why be so judgemental. You don't know what he was really like, nor do I.
|
|
|
Post by Clipper on Jul 10, 2009 21:32:03 GMT -5
I think one would have to have been hiding under a rock for the last ten years to "not know what Michael Jackson was like" Sleepy. I don't think it judgmental to have read and watched his life pass before us on the screen for the last ten years, and not have some serious concerns for his reputation with children.
Would you have allowed your grand kids or children to have spent time in his bed listening to "bedtime stories?" A grown man that feels it appropriate to continue to sleep with children in his bed after having fought one court case, is obviously a couple of french fries short of a happy meal.
Only God can "judge him." The rest of us are just expressing our opinions. He will not be accepted in, or rejected from, "heaven" because of my opinion of him. Of course among our membership, there are those that would debate the whole God and heaven scenario also. It is a discussion forum.
|
|
|
Post by Ralph on Jul 11, 2009 3:03:17 GMT -5
Though I appreciate the “entertainment” aspect, I will agree with Corner that most Hollywood or entertainment types usually are egocentric to the max. Of course considering what most folks consider “normal” is based so much upon the theories of Freud, who in my opinion is to the psychological world on about the same level as Madoff is to the investment world. Both a few fries short of any meal!
On the whole, as an entertainer I would say he was magnificent! I would also say that Bill Clinton was a great politician, but both of their personal lives sucked and they seemed to both have the morals of horned toads…..albeit Jackson’s went wayyyyy over the deep end.
While “we on the outside” are never privy to what life is really like in their respective worlds (luckily for us) we have to rely on what drips out of the edges. As their private lives go….. Well Clintons isn’t that far left of center to be right, face it…he was just a horny pervert. Jackson’s……..well, give an extra tap on that stake for me, and make sure the box is lined with lead when they pour the concrete in.
No sense in him glowing in the dark down there. ;D
|
|
|
Post by corner on Jul 11, 2009 6:04:41 GMT -5
Touble is every time Clinton got caught he sent troops somewhere to skirmish in some third world country to deflect the us from the obvious...and if you look at his history he banged some real butt ugly women Jennifer Flowers excluded...
|
|
|
Post by chris on Jul 12, 2009 7:00:20 GMT -5
This is not to say I agree with any of the above posts trashing MJ but simply amused by the lengths some will go for sake of amusement as in this clip [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELyTBXzfQJ8&eurl=http%3A%2F%2F [/youtube]
|
|
|
Post by corner on Jul 12, 2009 7:08:54 GMT -5
hes probabaly already met Hitler, Mussolini, Ghengis Khan, John Wayne Gacy etc.
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Jul 12, 2009 17:31:07 GMT -5
Funny.
Half the clip would have been funnier. Born in the middle of WW2, and living through the aftermath, my mind naturally gravitates to the actual movie scene and the historical scene it represents. Does anyone who has seen the movie know what the script actually portrays during this clip?
|
|
|
Post by chris on Jul 13, 2009 20:42:18 GMT -5
|
|