|
|
Post by Swimmy on Sept 17, 2008 21:53:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by concerned on Sept 18, 2008 9:49:45 GMT -5
I think its more about the wearing of boxer shorts underneath the baggy pants so that the boxer shorts and what is contained within them is exposed to the public. I'd like to wear the baggy paints like this but I am told I don't have an ass to show. I do however like the freedom of boxers as well as the freedom of baggy pants. So since this is about freedom I guess it does qualify for constitutional protection.
|
|
|
|
Post by Clipper on Sept 18, 2008 11:23:41 GMT -5
Yes Swimmy, we did discuss this at length last winter with Thelma leading the charge.
I have no objection to baggy pants. I see no reason for government intervention into letting your boxers show above them if that is what fires your rocket. I think it is wierd, idiotic, and ridiculous looking, but so is wearing an hat backwards. I saw a guy the other day that had his ball cap adjusted all the way out, and placed at a cocked angle covering the top of ONE ear. He looked like a total moron.
What I find more digusting than the baggy pants is the young girls that wear tight jeans that are slung so low that they have to shave the upper reaches of their pubic area to keep the hair from showing above the jeans, and when they bend over, the thong underwear is stuck in the crack of their ass and shows about 6 inches above the jeans. It is like beautified "plumber's butt". Like what one would see when the overweight plumber is under your sink changing the trap.
That is not "style", that is "LEWD.
Baggy pants are fine. Legislate the showing of bare ass above them. I see boys pulling the pants lower and adjusting them to show some butt. We have always been seen pulling baggy pants UP, not DOWN. Are these kids frigging wierd or what?
|
|
|
|
Post by kim on Sept 18, 2008 14:07:03 GMT -5
The people who wear the baggy pants look like morons. I saw one recently who, I'm not kidding, had his jeans around his KNEES! His red boxers were showing, and his jeans were, literally, around his knees. But hey, if they want to look like idiots, I don't care. Unless it's my son. My son had better NEVER dress like that! :-o
|
|
|
|
Post by corner on Sept 18, 2008 15:55:06 GMT -5
clipp watcha mea wearing a hat backwards all this time i thought they sold them with the brims in the back!
|
|
|
|
Post by Clipper on Sept 18, 2008 16:21:56 GMT -5
Haha, they probably do by now. Nothing would surprise me anymore.
I always thought the only one that wore their cap backwards was the catcher on a ball team. Silly me!
|
|
|
|
Post by Ralph on Sept 18, 2008 20:38:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Swimmy on Sept 18, 2008 20:52:40 GMT -5
You beat me to it, Ralph! |
|
|
|
Post by Swimmy on Sept 18, 2008 20:56:01 GMT -5
I always enjoy those 40-something mothers who wear the low-cut jeans and have their thongs riding high. Always make sure to compliment them and wink.  |
|
|
|
Post by Clipper on Sept 18, 2008 22:04:58 GMT -5
A 40 something woman is responsible for her own welfare. I little girl 13 or 14 is asking for trouble dressing like that. Some hormonal little stud will be getting into those low riding drawers and knocking her up, and then Mommy will wonder why.
I guess I am old fashioned. I can't understand how people can bitch about kids being so sexually active, and then let their barely developing 13 yr old daughters run around half frigging naked. Duhhh!
Hell, I don't mind a well built 40 year old with her thong showing, haha. I am with swimmy. Compliment them and make'em blush. Always tempted to give them a wedgie though, haha. Probably would be considered sexual assault, LOL.
Hell, now that I think about it, I would not care if a 40 year old with a good body, wore nothing BUT a thong, haha.
|
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Sept 20, 2008 18:16:47 GMT -5
Maybe I'll go to a "make your own" T-shirt place and have one printed that says, "I'm wearing a thong under these work pants. Actually, two."
|
|
|
|
Post by Clipper on Sept 20, 2008 18:59:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by wilum47 on Sept 20, 2008 22:50:00 GMT -5
Clip,
We've come a long way from being issued baggy fatigue pants and the first thing we did as run them down to the tailer's to hem them in. Darn things got caught on everything!
|
|
|
|
Post by Clipper on Sept 21, 2008 7:24:01 GMT -5
I guess the major difference with pants today and our jungle fatigues was that the waist band now is way large for the person wearing the pants. Our jungle fatigues had baggy legs and ass, but the waist band fit the individual and were buttoned snuggly around the waist, so they didn't tend to fall off, LOL.
Can you imagine trying to navigate through the jungle, weapon in one hand and the other hand trying to hold your damn pants up. Kind leaves a shortage of limbs to push back the vegetation and brush doesn't it. How about crawling on your belly with those baggy pants of today. You would crawl right out of them, hehe.
|
|
|
|
Post by Swimmy on Sept 21, 2008 16:17:23 GMT -5
A 40 something woman is responsible for her own welfare. I little girl 13 or 14 is asking for trouble dressing like that. Some hormonal little stud will be getting into those low riding drawers and knocking her up, and then Mommy will wonder why. I guess I am old fashioned. I can't understand how people can bitch about kids being so sexually active, and then let their barely developing 13 yr old daughters run around half frigging naked. Duhhh! Not only that, but kids are bombarded by sexual innuendos. Every where you turn, there is something relating to sex. I get so angry when I hear parents who cried so loudly about Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction" allow their kids to watch everyday tv. They're the same parents who are against any fruitful sex ed classes, but don't understand why their kids are dealing with STDs, pregnancies, and increased sex assaults. I forget where I read it, but preteen and teenage girls are increasingly victims of sex crimes from their peers. It was a disturbing article. |
|
