|
Post by Ralph on Jul 28, 2008 23:59:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by frankcor on Jul 29, 2008 13:16:13 GMT -5
What an amazing story.
As for Leddick, what a waste of a skin.
|
|
|
Post by rickolney on Jul 29, 2008 15:32:18 GMT -5
I am ashamed to have read that the scumbag lives in Mohawk. Not that we don't have crime here, but this is a nice little community that normally looks out for each other. Here's to a long prison sentence for this child molesting bum. Three words. Put. Him. Down. Toss his ass in a cell and give him all the mental health he can handle. Good for those guys that went in and found her.
|
|
|
Post by frankcor on Jul 29, 2008 15:51:45 GMT -5
That's Ralph's crosshair. While not dead center, a double-tap to that region will certainly do the trick.
|
|
|
Post by Clipper on Jul 29, 2008 16:08:01 GMT -5
Ralph is simply being humane. He doesn't want to break the poor guy nose, while he is blowing the back out of his head! It is called a precision lobotomy.
|
|
|
Post by corner on Jul 29, 2008 16:29:38 GMT -5
whiuch is the only cure for a sex offender!
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Jul 29, 2008 18:33:09 GMT -5
Quote from article:
Guess so! Gotta wonder about supervision here, too.
|
|
|
Post by Ralph on Jul 30, 2008 2:20:59 GMT -5
I was lazy and half asleep when I did that one. Like frank said, that close and it don't matter much anyhow.
Dave, I didn't really want to go down that road but, if you're playing with scum, don't expect much in return. So your point is well taken and was shared here at our house as well.
|
|
|
Post by Clipper on Jul 30, 2008 9:28:41 GMT -5
I also had that thought. Why would you allow your kids to be in the yard alone with this guy, much less go for a "walk" with him. I mean, be real! This guy has been locked up and sexually dePRIVED for a period of time. Would that not make one wary that he might also be dePRAVED??
I am a firm believer that child molesters should have their nuts removed as part of the criminal process. If they win on appeal, give them back their nuts! IN A CANNING JAR, PICKLED IN FORMALDEHYDE!
(I know. I am not being fair to the guy. He DOES have a right to be PROVEN GUILTY before such a radical surgery is performed!)
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jul 30, 2008 11:21:58 GMT -5
Not only their nuts removed and their hands because they can still go after kids. This situtation and the one concerning the guy just driving around at the parks, and then going to the daycare asking for a kid is really upsetting. I don't understand how or why anyone would want to harm a child. It makes me sick, and very very angry.
|
|
|
Post by frankcor on Jul 30, 2008 13:39:19 GMT -5
Talk about castrating sex offenders may display a fundamental misunderstanding about rape and similar crimes. Rape is not a sex crime. It is a crime of ultimate power and control.
The perp needs to be put away for good.
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jul 30, 2008 15:18:30 GMT -5
When something involves a child I believe in the death penalty.
|
|
|
Post by Clipper on Jul 30, 2008 15:33:45 GMT -5
Well Frank, I well understand the power and control motive in some cases of rape, but I have to disagree that it is not a sex crime. It may be a power thing in some cases, but I am would have to disagree that it is not a sex crime. A matter of semantics I would assume. I also think that assuming it is a power and control issue, the person would lose that feeling of power with the lack of testosterone, and his missing ornaments. I don't think he would want to undress and show off his little wienie and no accessories hanging below it.
If I remember correctly from a discussion of mandatory castration a few years ago, castration and lack of testosterone, causes a man's manhood to shrink and shrivel, and chest hair to fall out. A man with no testicles will take on feminine characteristics, and his breasts will swell. I doubt that he would feel very manly and driven to have sex. We could have a prison full of eunuchs to do the bidding of Bubba and the boys.
|
|
|
Post by dgriffin on Jul 30, 2008 21:52:38 GMT -5
This situtation and the one concerning the guy just driving around at the parks, and then going to the daycare asking for a kid is really upsetting. At my youngest granddaughter's daycare center near Albany, only those on a parent-approved list can pick up a child. They need picture ID and the staff has to be told in person by the parent prior to the pickup by a specific person. Even though both my wife and I are on the list, my daughter can't tell the staff I will pick up Erin and then have my wife show up.
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Jul 31, 2008 8:27:04 GMT -5
Well at the daycare I bring my daughter to we have a contact list of people that will pick her up and we have to write a note and they check for the license and that person has to sign into the building.
|
|